Search for: "People v Childs" Results 4581 - 4600 of 6,945
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2016, 8:58 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  There is no way a child could safely use that swing set without being at risk of inhaling the deadly fibers. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
Given the victim's age and intelligence, the Court of Appeals was of the opinion that it was inexcusable for the prosecution to have failed (or refused) to supply a clearer time frame for the event(s) which led to the criminal charge and was compelled to dismiss the case in its entirety.No merit badges will be awarded here.For a copy of the Court of Appeal's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 12:57 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
"  The accused, sheepishly, states in the affirmative.Last year, however, the SCOTUS decided Padilla v Kentucky. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 8:48 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" asks @TracyClarkFlory pjblack.me/w546GE "Professional fact-checking about as broken as professional journalism" argues @pareenepjblack.me/t8e7yB "People Are Awesome: The Anonymous Movement to Pay Off Layaway Accounts" reports @GOODpjblack.me/taPdbP "Can the U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 8:05 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Kids’ Mild Brain Injury Can Have Long-Term Effect, August 24, 2016, By Maureen Salamon, WebMD More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:44 pm by Jeralyn
I found her not fully forewarned of the consequence of her actions," Stuart V. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 2:52 am
The Court did not seem to take note of the devolution of constitutional responsibilities and stuck to the age old line taken in Kartar Singh v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 9:29 am
Born an American citizen in Louisiana in 1980, Hamdi moved with his family to Saudi Arabia as a child. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
To be sure, the two statutes being challenged here are different: Challenging a child pornography statute may lead people to take a dimmer view of the challenger (on the theory that he must have some personal interest in child pornography) than would challenging a law that kept some parents from relinquishing a child for adoption. [read post]