Search for: "People v Dollar"
Results 4581 - 4600
of 4,627
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2007, 12:36 am
OMRDD worker registry Last Act: 02/26/07 referred to mental health
LAW / CORRECTNSA5911
Tedisco (MS) -- Requires department of motor vehicles to provide police officers with information on level 3 sex offenders based on license or registration inquiry BLURB : V & T L. level 3 sex offenders Last Act: 02/26/07 referred to transportation
LAW / CORRECTNSA5944
McDonough (MS) -- Requires school bus stops not to be located near the residences of sex offenders BLURB : Ed L.… [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:37 am
Criminal Sanction Impact. 02/20/07 referred to codes
LAW / CRIM-PROCA5587
Seminerio -- Requires the district attorney to notify all victims of case disposition SUMM : Amd S440.50, CP L Requires the district attorney to inform a victim by letter of the final disposition of a case against a defendant, in order to give such victim the opportunity to exercise his right to give a victim impact statement. 02/20/07 referred to codes
LAW / CRIM-PROCA5588
Morelle (MS) -- Authorizes… [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 6:32 am
The following very informative piece was written by North Carolina family law attorney Mark Sullivan and appeared on the Solosez listserv. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 5:14 am
It undoubtedly spent hundreds of thousands of dollars (at least) to defend what the opinion makes clear was a suit based upon a wing and a prayer (we're being charitable here). [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 8:38 am
The Supreme Court today decided the case of Philip Morris v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 7:00 am
On Long Island, the case of Singer v. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 11:45 pm
But, I don't mind.In a case decided in December, called Schoennagel v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 9:12 am
Aaron is one of those people who is very opinionated, to a fault, and unnecessarily combative.Once Aaron almost got into a fight with someone over -- get this -- a seat at a CLE presentation. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 11:03 am
[2] Complaint for Violations of Sherman Antitrust Act, Cartwright Act, California Unfair Competition Law, Consumer Legal Remedies Act and Monopolization of Business Practices at 1, Tucker v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
I was walking past a table in the Michigan Law Library when a fellow seated there, who in our first year had finished second in our class out of almost 400 people, asked me whether I might have any ideas he could use. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:23 am
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/29/07 referred to codesLAW / CORRECTNSA3787
Gottfried (MS) -- Provides for review by the department of health of policies and practices regarding HIV, AIDS and HCV at correctional facilitiesSUMM : Amd S206, Pub Health L Authorizes and directs the department of health to review any policy or practice instituted in facilities operated by the department of correctional services and in local correctional facilities regarding human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), acquired… [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 5:04 am
Related Web Resources: SEC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 6:20 pm
He wrote in People v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 5:01 am
The actual case is Liebeck v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:42 pm
., Medicaid) for care and services provided by chiropractors and supplies related thereto. 01/23/07 referred to social servicesLAW / CORRECTNSA3264
Pretlow (MS) -- Relates to sanctions and penalties for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol; repealerSUMM : Amd S1192, rpld & add S1193, V & T L Relates to sanctions and penalties for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol; creates new offenses of criminal intoxication and aggravated… [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 4:58 am
Cavin v. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 5:42 pm
We have not seen, in any of the Court’s recent opinions, discussion of patents as “monopolies,” along the lines of Justice Douglas’ concurrence in Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 10:20 pm
(See Diaz v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
By Eric Goldman * JP Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:38 am
The General Assembly is now weighing in on the Court of Appeals ruling in Bruce Jones v. [read post]
