Search for: "Peters v. Peters" Results 4581 - 4600 of 7,484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2010, 3:55 am
’ for alcohol: the opinion of the Advocate General in OHIM v BORCO (Class 46) Two new references for CJEU: any more news? [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am by Kelly
Thermo-Ply, Inc (Patently-O) 7th Circuit rejects Zippo sliding scale for personal jurisdiction: Poulsen Roser A/S v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
The second is The Copyright Wars: Three Centuries of Trans-Atlantic Battle, written by Peter Baldwin (University of California), which is the first major trans-Atlantic history of copyright from its origins to today. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:01 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
The court in Sacklow v Betts very recently encountered the issue of a legal name change in NJ for a transgender child. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:01 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
The court in Sacklow v Betts very recently encountered the issue of a legal name change in NJ for a transgender child. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:31 am by Mark Walsh
Anticipation is high for the last argument before the holiday break, and one of the biggest cases of the term, Fisher v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 2:07 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Less than four months before the launch of the new system, Kluwer IP Law interviewed Véron and asked him how it all started. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:23 am by Peter Mahler
Accordingly, dismissal of both the fraud and breach of fiduciary duty claims was warranted (see generally Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney Inc., 88 NY2d 413, 421 [1996]). [read post]