Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 4581 - 4600
of 55,703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2024, 1:59 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:42 am
Trinko, LLP, 540 U.S. 398, 407–09 (2004), see also Aspen Skiing, 472 U.S. at 601; Otter Tail Power Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:53 am
That impression was consistent with the Court’s most recent major decision on bankruptcy court authority, the 2011 decision in Stern v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:15 am
The state Supreme Court in that recent high-profile case, Abigaile Lebron v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 10:14 am
It's not a court opinion - yet - but Judge Redden made his position clear in a May 18, 2009 letter to the parties in National Wildlife Federation v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:04 am
In the most recent Nazi-looted art appeal of Grosz v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:06 pm
Florida Power & Light, Inc., 895 So. 2d 1143, 1145 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), Jefferies v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 2:09 pm
This is the sovereign power at its nadir, not its zenith. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 3:16 pm
One is that the Supreme Court’s 1875 decision in Totten v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm
In Presser v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:50 pm
Ross Holding and Management Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
But Consolidated Edison and Perry make clear that the exclusion was upheld in spite of being content-based, solely because of this extra government power over nonpublic fora (a power that is not implicated in this case). [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 6:27 am
In Yaman v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:49 am
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court in Khushboo v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:32 am
Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in one of the seminal cases in this area, American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 11:13 am
Monday, in Seila Law v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 12:53 pm
Rywalt v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 4:33 am
It points out that the options remaining to try to regain integrity in the system depend upon a few cases yet pending: The two categories of cases not targeted for dismissal in the United States' instant motion to dismiss are those brought against governmental entities (Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc v Bush, No C 07-0109; Center for Constitutional Rights v Bush, No C 07-1115; Guzzi v Bush, No C 06-6225; Shubert v Bush, No C 07-0693) and those brought… [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:59 pm
Powerful. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 7:28 pm
Grossi, Simona, Roe V. [read post]
