Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 4581 - 4600
of 7,625
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2013, 8:50 am
Diane Marie Amann previews next month’s oral argument in BG Group PLC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 6:51 am
The employer never provided the employees with any agreement or memorandum stating that it intended to compensate them by “commission. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:33 am
But it is a choice the people of Alabama have made, and nothing [in] the Constitution of the United States forbids it. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:09 am
Hasen discusses changes to some states’ voting laws in the wake of last Term’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am
Wider Implications The proceedings in Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook have already attracted significant attention from the Equality and Human Rights Commission; with the Secretary of State acting as a further intervener. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
The Ruling Heard ‘Round the Country: Baehr v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
(my emphasis)[3] It has not been challenged by the [patent proprietor] that example 3 of document D5 […] discloses a process for the oxidation of ethane to a mixture of ethene and acetic acid over a catalyst containing Mo, V, Nb and Au […] wherein ethylene and water are fed to the reaction zone in a relative ratio of 1:2 by weight ([…] 5% v/v ethylene and 10% v/v water). [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am
Young, 13-95, the state-on-top habeas case asking whether (1) a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 5:22 am
” At Mayer Brown’s Class Defense blog, Brian Netter and Dan Himmelfarb discuss the brief filed by the United States in Fifth Third Bancorp. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:50 am
Yesterday the Court denied review in Pruitt v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:49 am
” Briefly: At JURIST, Andy Grewal discusses last month’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:19 pm
This in particular since “the public retains only an imperfect memory of the marks registered in the Member States or of Community marks ... [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:14 am
Amy Dillard discusses Hall v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:10 am
The Justices certainly did not speak with one voice when they heard arguments Wednesday in Mississippi v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 6:39 am
What about an OHP’s report which specifically states that an employee is not disabled for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010? [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
This is because the two opposing experts are going have to testify about the state of knowledge of the person skilled in the art with regard to Baldwin's Rules for ring closure. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:47 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Bond v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
And in Stanton v. [read post]
