Search for: "S. W., an individual" Results 4581 - 4600 of 11,733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2023, 5:40 am by Will Baude
This could be because the individual Justices have all internalized pretty much the same criteria for grants. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:11 am
” Wachter recalls a nurse’s recent New York Times commentary noting that, “[W]e hurt people because it’s the only way we know to make them better … which is why the growing focus on measuring ‘patient satisfaction’ as a way to judge the quality of a hospital’s care is worrisomely off the mark. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 11:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Ultimately granted patents on isolated DNA: gene excised from naturally occurring chromosome, regardless of individual from whom it was taken. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 11:30 am by Virginia Hunt
          From the SuperBetterwebsite, “At Superbetterlabs, we apply technology and design to empower individuals and communities to live epic lives. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 8:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
… [W]ithout the renewed promises of authentication, positive reviews, and Craigslist referrals consumers are less likely to pay for subscriptions to the platform. [read post]
22 May 2013, 12:24 pm by Gregory Forman
 The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of lifetime monitoring but found the denial of judicial review was unconstitutional, holding: [W]e find constitutional the baseline requirement of section 23-3-540(c) that individuals convicted of CSC-First or lewd act on a minor mandatorily submit to electronic monitoring upon their release from incarceration or violation of their probation or parole. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 9:09 am
Neptune City Borough Municipal Court Information Neptune City Borough Municipal Court 106 W. [read post]
26 May 2018, 10:10 am by Zamansky
In February, FINRA warned that scam artists were, “us[ing] FINRA’s name and logo in correspondence – including a fake signature from FINRA President and Chief Executive Officer Robert W. [read post]
”[4] The Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Seventh Circuit’s interpretation of the FCA, emphasizing that “[w]hat matters for an FCA case is whether the defendant knew the claim was false,” because “[t]he FCA’s scienter element refers to respondents’ knowledge and subjective beliefs—not to what an objectively reasonable person may have known or believed. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:35 am by Mark Greenberg, Harry Litman
At best, they sacrifice individual justice on the altar of a utilitarian calculus and may seem to fail to give equal res [read post]