Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 4581 - 4600 of 21,135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2010, 9:04 pm by James Yang
After patent issuance, the patentee has enforceable rights in that he/she can sue another entity for damages and/or an injunction to stop that entity from making, using, selling, offering for sale or importing the patented invention into the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:25 am
Trying every trick in the book, could lead to an appellate court throwing the book right back at you.For a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: Willis v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 4:06 pm by Jim Singer
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit did just that in John Wiley and Sons Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:52 am
 (Eli Lilly v Novopharm (2010 FCA 197)This exercise requires:Reviewing the entire specification (claims and entire disclosure)Identifying the promises made in the entire specification Determining whether the patent fulfils those promises by demonstration or sound prediction.This exercise is a question of law viewed through the skilled person at the time of filing (with the assistance of expert evidence) and has been applied in several cases (BMS v Apotex (2005 FC 1348),… [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:39 am
 (Eli Lilly v Novopharm (2010 FCA 197)This exercise requires:Reviewing the entire specification (claims and entire disclosure)Identifying the promises made in the entire specification Determining whether the patent fulfils those promises by demonstration or sound prediction.This exercise is a question of law viewed through the skilled person at the time of filing (with the assistance of expert evidence) and has been applied in several cases (BMS v Apotex (2005 FC 1348),… [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 11:33 am by Stephen Bilkis
2011 NY Slip Op 21015 The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 1:58 pm
Please...The Anti-Google Bill And An Apology from LG Preface:   My apologies, but a loyal geeker just pointed out...United States v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:49 am by Jeff Schmitt
” Hemel argues that federal laws prohibiting state taxation of things like internet sales are unconstitutional under Murphy. [read post]