Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 4581 - 4600
of 4,637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
(With the exception of a mid-September media law conference in central London featuring Justice Stephen Breyer, all other events we tracked this summer took place in the United States.) [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:36 pm
" It has been a truism since Marbury v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:41 am
Unlike Kiobel, there is no real dispute that the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA), the law on which the plaintiffs in Mohamad were seeking to rely, applies to conduct that occurred outside the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am
The RSVP deadline is Jan. 16, not Jan.14 as stated in the flier. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 6:25 am
The Federal Election Campaign Act and Buckley v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Despite the threat posed by terrorism after 9/11, Habermas’ earlier observation in La Paix perpétuelle: le bicentenaire d’une idée kantienne (1996) still applies: “the globalization of risks objectively united the world a long time ago, making it an involuntary community based on the risks run by all. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
They’d look for some little snippet of text in the Lanham Act; Scalia was a textualist but he could read a law in its entirety. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
The supreme court of Great Britain is televised, as is the supreme court of Canada, the state supreme courts, the U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm
And Article V enables the states, by “the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,” to require Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:11 am
In Employment Division v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:03 pm
(Herring v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
There have been divergent applications of the theory in the same case, as exemplified by Justice Antonin Scalia’s majority opinion and Justice John Paul Stevens’ dissent in District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:36 pm
Kavanaugh acknowledges that “[i]ndependent agencies are constitutional under Humphrey’s Executor v. the United States” before adding that “what is constitutional is not always wise. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 8:42 am
" (Abstract ID: 1143578) This Article considers the constitutional status of state punitive damage judgments and the particular obligation that sister-states have to enforce them. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 8:57 am
Consider, for example, Thomas' view of the Commerce Clause that led to his concurring opinion in United States v Lopez. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:45 am
Similarly, in Nixon v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:13 am
Almost immediately after the May 29 decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:03 am
As I understand the state of play, this is like an oxymoron for Solum, but conventional wisdom for originalists. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
It is the finest bench, pound for pound in the United States. [read post]
