Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 4581 - 4600
of 29,285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2024, 2:20 pm
Jarkesy v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 1:06 am
The complaint was recently dismissed in Aharonian v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 5:02 am
State v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 2:08 pm
Brown v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:14 am
Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 9:03 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:03 am
It seems more likely that Congress will ask states to disclose basic information about how the election system is run than to regulate state election systems top-down. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 4:32 pm
In Bridge v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
The closest one finds is the 14th Amendment, except that it only authorizes penal legislation applicable to state actors, not to private persons generally, and the offenders in this case were not state actors.The authority cited for all of these charges is the Commerce Clause, interpreted as authorizing criminal penalties under the Necessary and Proper Clause, mainly based on the Supreme Court precedent in Wickard v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:00 am
Donald Tobin With the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Mayo Foundation for Education and Research v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 5:44 pm
§ 48 in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:00 am
Donald Tobin With the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Mayo Foundation for Education and Research v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
Perry; Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C. was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
In Boerne v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 11:46 am
Both sides expect that either Congress or the U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 10:00 pm
Explaining his variance in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 10:49 am
In Navajo Nation v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
United States, Congress may protect the tenure of members of multi-member independent commissions from at-will presidential removal. [read post]
