Search for: "State v. Lively"
Results 4581 - 4600
of 25,478
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2014, 4:34 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:21 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:07 am
In Bluman v FEC, the court upheld 2 U.S.C §441(e)(a), which prohibits contributions from individuals living in the U.S. but not admitted for permanent residency. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
” In that same year, Amish families living in Wisconsin had been prosecuted by the state for violations of state law requiring children to attend school beyond eighth grade. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
Since this warrant failed to satisfy that standard, the Queens County Supreme Court granted the defendants’ suppression and dismissal request.On appeal, the Appellate Division, Second Department, also had some issues with the underlying paperwork, which described the “Subject Location,” as “`a two-story, two-family home,’ with a ‘right main entrance’ and a ‘left main entrance,’ in which ‘[t]he right entrance opens up to a living… [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Doe v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In Clark v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 12:00 am
Supreme Court case that prohibits it, Batson v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 5:00 am
”Since the mother was unable to show that relocating to Rhode Island was “economically necessary,” that the children’s lives would be enhanced “socially or educationally,” and that the move wouldn’t negatively impact the kids’ relationship with their dad, the AD2 thought the Family Court’s determination had a “sound and substantial basis in the record,” and left it undisturbed.No shipping these kids to The Ocean… [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
In State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:54 am
As it happens my law school is housed in a building named for John Lord O'Brian, a one-time United States Attorney most famous for prosecuting Eugene V. [read post]
23 May 2023, 5:00 am
”Since the mother was unable to show that relocating to Rhode Island was “economically necessary,” that the children’s lives would be enhanced “socially or educationally,” and that the move wouldn’t negatively impact the kids’ relationship with their dad, the AD2 thought the Family Court’s determination had a “sound and substantial basis in the record,” and left it undisturbed.No shipping these kids to The Ocean… [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:12 pm
After all, if someone's actually going to read the thing, you might as well make it look good (and be right).I could live with all of that. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 4:34 am
February 23, 2023 - 4:10 PM (Live at Arizona State University): El Burro, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:22 pm
Supreme Court decision in Plyler v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 2:20 am
Shortly before the website went live, the Respondent, “H”, opened two bank accounts, one with Lloyds and the other with Barclays. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 9:11 am
Robert Phillips, No. 96,754 (Sedgwick)State v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 3:36 pm
In one case, Fields v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:28 am
In Butler v. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm
The question is not whether some readers would have misunderstood the satire as stating facts but whether the average or reasonable reader would have come to that view. [read post]
