Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 4581 - 4600
of 19,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2013, 7:25 am
(quotation marks and citations to numerous federal cases omitted). [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 8:22 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
” In a brief per curiam decision, the justices also dismissed United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:00 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:14 pm
Citing Anderson v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:06 pm
If the mark has been in use for a while you may even be able to get the Examining Attorney to accept a simple declaration stating how long the mark has been in use. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
"To this end, a medical opinion on the issue of causation must signify a probability as to the underlying cause of the claimant's injury which is supported by a rational basis" (Matter of Mayette v Village of Massena Fire Dept., 49 AD3d 920, 922 [2008] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Lichten v New York City Tr. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
"To this end, a medical opinion on the issue of causation must signify a probability as to the underlying cause of the claimant's injury which is supported by a rational basis" (Matter of Mayette v Village of Massena Fire Dept., 49 AD3d 920, 922 [2008] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Lichten v New York City Tr. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am
“To state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must allege: (1) that the attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession; and (2) that the attorney’s breach of the duty proximately caused the plaintiff actual and ascertainable damages” (Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d 169, 176 [2011] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Leder v… [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
No court will go along with this today as stated. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 12:48 pm
Furey, 18 N.Y.3d at 287, 938 N.Y.S.2d 277, 961 N.E.2d 668 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
At the ABA Journal, Mark Hansen discusses the cert. grant in the consolidated cases Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:59 pm
S., at 871 (Souter, J., dissenting) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 9:07 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 2:50 pm
” Inwood Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
When you read the complete text of Hamilton v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 11:19 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 11:21 am
As quick off the mark as usual, Justice Scalia’s unanimous opinion for the Court in Law v. [read post]
