Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 4581 - 4600
of 5,862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2011, 11:36 am
On June 16, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in J.D.B. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 1:12 pm
The majority in Bullcoming comprised Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan, Scalia, and Thomas. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 12:09 pm
Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
In Krueger v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:17 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:33 pm
” (In an earlier opinion, the Seventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
Justice Ginsburg dissented (joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan), arguing that "the constitutional limits on a state court's adjudicatory authority derive from considerations of due process, not state sovereignty. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 11:04 am
In J.D.B. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:30 pm
’” Citing State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 8:21 am
Verrilli Jr. told the court that the case, Leal Garcia v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:02 pm
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 427 F.3d 446 (2005) that federal courts retained jurisdiction because the TCPA's provision authorizing private actions in state court did not declare state jurisdiction to be exclusive.The petition for review is Mims v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:07 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:33 am
Whiting affect the Court’s decision [A2] in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:46 pm
United States on a good-faith exception to exclusion for a change in case law, and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd on qualified immunity from civil suit. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:22 am
United States, was about the scope of the exclusionary rule. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 9:46 pm
Indeed, some years ago the International Court of Justice had found a violation of the VCCR in relation to a group of people of whom Garcia was a member in the case of Avena v United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:26 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Per Curiam 564 U. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:47 pm
Justice Breyer dissented, joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, and concurred with the United States’ argument. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:02 pm
On April 26, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
