Search for: "Welling v. Welling"
Results 4581 - 4600
of 110,252
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2023, 7:54 am
E.P.A. and Sierra Club v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
From Friday's decision in Amor v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
Republican presidential candidates have a sound basis to raise the issue well before then, whether in litigation or otherwise. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
Facing the Music Underpinned by the legitimate (and recurring) government aim to prevent terrorism and crime, the U.K. proposal comes at a time of intense global debates centering the importance of cybersecurity as well as the on-going efforts of governments across the world to undermine now-everyday communication security measures (such as encryption). [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Technologists v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
M.B. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 3:13 am
Pompey Coal Company v Borough of Jessup, 2023 WL 3260534 (MD PA 5/4/2023) [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 11:52 am
SA v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
Imagine, for example, that a guy has a set of explosives wired up to a plunger, with twenty people in the area, with the goal of killing one person (Jim) therein but knowing full well that the explosion will kill all twenty. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:01 am
., homicide, drug-trafficking, robberies and “pre-capture terrorist offenses not related to the conflict” (Martinez (2019) 83 referring to U.S. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Last month, the International Center for the Prosecution of the Crime of Aggression (ICPA) against Ukraine opened its doors in The Hague. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:34 am
The burden then shifted to the petitioner to raise a question of fact as to whether the statute of limitations has been tolled or is otherwise inapplicable, or whether the petitioner actually commenced the proceeding within the applicable limitations period (see Edem v Wondemagegehu, 175 AD3d at 467; Coleman v Wells Fargo & Co. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:15 am
” The new disclosure obligation may require some fine tuning to pre-existing disclosure controls and procedures to reflect the disclosures that must be provided in response to the new Form 8-K item, as well as the process for tracking whether the Item 1.05 Form 8-K must be amended to reflect information that is not determined or is unavailable at the time of the required initial filing. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
In Satz v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Haywood v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 3:11 am
Property, LLC v Butler County, OH, 2023 WL 3270901 (6th Cir. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am
On March 15, 2023, Yuga moved for partial summary judgment with respect to the unfair competition and cybersquatting claims as well as several affirmative defenses. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:21 am
There, Plaintiffs (a mother individually and on behalf of her child) alleged that Defendants Johnson & Johnson and Walmart failed to include a warning on acetaminophen products they sold pursuant to the relevant OTC monograph, as well as under NDAs, that use of acetaminophen while pregnant causes children to be born with autism spectrum disorder and ADHD. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 2:23 pm
In the recent decision styled PVH Polymath Venture Holdings Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 5:20 am
As IPKat readers are surely aware, his fame extends well beyond the art world, given that Koons has contributed as litigant to some of the most interesting copyright case law around the world [see, eg, IPKat coverage here].A few days ago, it was the turn of the Italian Supreme Court to rule (decision 23935/2023 Koons v Garrone) in a case involving him and a copy of an artwork – specifically: a porcelain sculpture titled The Serpents – that he has refused to acknowledge… [read post]