Search for: "Williams v. People" Results 4581 - 4600 of 4,879
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am by INFORRM
According to William Malcolm, Google’s Senior Privacy Counsel, Google has delisted in 41% of cases and declined to delist in 59% of cases, attempting to be ‘thoughtful and pragmatic’ adopt a nuanced criteria and apply a consistent pan-European approach. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
” (Title VII prohibits discrimination based on a number of protected characteristics, including race and sex.)In Ledbetter v. [read post]
Williams, 7 F.Supp. 2d 40, 52 (D.D.C. 1998), vacated in part, United Staes v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am by Ronald Collins
Some people think of this as a sign of courage; others as an unwarranted smugness. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am by Norman L. Eisen
This model prosecution memorandum (or “pros memo”) assesses federal charges Special Counsel Jack Smith may bring against former President Donald Trump for alleged criminal interference in the 2020 election. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 1:23 pm by David Kopel
Georgetown Law's Dean, William Treanor, issued a statement denouncing Shapiro. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:42 pm by Jasmine Joseph
Yet many of these works, in particular the novels of William Faulkner, address some of the same thematic and sociological concerns that animate § 5. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 10:16 am by Michael Lowe
Attorney General William Barr requesting information concerning the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) handling of the Coronavirus Pandemic and the health and safety of both (1) those imprisoned and (2) those working in federal prisons. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:05 am by Joseph Margulies
Habib, who is Australian, had been one of the four petitioners in Rasul v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am by @ErikJHeels
All of this was decided by the people in the form of the US Constitution. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]