Search for: "Blood v. Blood" Results 4601 - 4620 of 7,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
C.A., Feb. 14, 2012) (34653) May 30, 2013 Straddle evidence is admissible to rebut the statutory presumption the blood alcohol level exceeds the legal limit. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:14 am by Chris Seaton
Note: Following the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decision in Jones v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 6:05 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
The recent decision of the British Columbia Court of Appeal in A.B. v C.D. v E.F. offers a couple of troubling conclusions with respect to the rights of children and whether determining the presence of family violence requires proof of intent not prescribed by statute. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 1:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Thus, a timely protest is an essential prerequisite for relief under a CPL 330.30 (1) claim of an error of law, unless the error has deprived the defendant of a fundamental right akin to People v Davidson, People v Padro and People v Antommarchi. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:17 am by SHG
Some religious people think blood transfusions aren’t right either. [read post]
The Suffolk County law regarding domestic partnerships requires that to register as a domestic partnership the couple must have: both as residents of Suffolk County or one is employed by the County; both partners being eighteen years or older and competent to be able to bind themselves legally; both not married to anyone else or in another domestic partnership currently or within the six months before the registration; the couple cannot be blood relatives that would prevent them from being… [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 11:00 am by Ilya Somin
And, obviously, I am in no position to judge who deserves how much blame for what seems to be longstanding bad blood between the Kochs and Cato President Ed Crane. [read post]