Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 34,117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Gang Cases Update – People v. Rodriguez (California Supremes Bring Presents, Not Coal For Christmas)
8 Jan 2013, 9:47 pm
Just one month later, the Fourth Appellate District handed down the case of People v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 7:44 am
Supreme Court in the Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm
” (…) Glaser Weil’s argument focused on MDQ, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:13 am
California is available here. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 9:43 pm
Twenty years ago, the Federal Circuit grappled with the application of the written description requirement to biotechnology inventions, in seminal cases beginning with Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 5:54 am
A decision by the California Supreme Court, McHugh v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:09 pm
However, in California, employers were given pretty clear guidance by the California Supreme Court in Ross v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:40 pm
Even if the California Supreme Court interprets California law to place only minimal obligations on employers, the e [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 8:08 am
Bartlett v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:42 am
Scotusblog gathers coverage of video game trade associations’ motion seeking over $1.1 million in legal fees and expenses stemming from their challenge to the now invalidated California law regulating the sale of violent games to minors. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am
Google) and California Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 10:00 pm
It is the federal district court matter of United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 7:03 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
The case Ferreira v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 9:13 am
On the heels of increased class action filings under California’s current ARL (see e.g., Kruger v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 9:01 am
Following the California Court of Appeal’s decision in See’s Candy Shops, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 5:57 am
Here is the motion in Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 3:09 pm
Given that the potential existed for the federal court in Michigan to consider whether California law should apply, transferring the case would not cut against public policy. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 3:28 pm
In Nisei Farmers League v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:22 pm
In the case of McDonald v . [read post]
