Search for: "Court of Appeals, 5th District" Results 4601 - 4620 of 5,171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2024, 9:00 am by Mavrick Law Firm
Nieves–Garcia, 826 So.2d 415 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (per curiam), Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal held that the defendant’s knowledge about a confidential database created as part of a confidential strategic marketing plan was a legitimate business interest because a competitor hired the defendant as its marketing representative. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:32 pm by cdw
LEXIS 13728 (4th Cir 7/6/2010)(unpublished) Noncapital grant of relief to permit a new appeal in state court White v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:37 am by David Lat
We have long valued the clerkship experience, with more than 25% of our associates, counsel and partners having held federal court clerkships (13 Circuit and 11 District Court). [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
District Court Judge Henry Hudson set a trial date of Nov. 26 at Vick's arraignment. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:52 am by John Elwood
Jackson Docket: 10-797 Issue(s): Whether a ruling by the court of appeals on habeas, reversing a district court’s decision and finding a state prosecutor’s proffered race-neutral bases for peremptorily striking two out of three African-American jurors insufficient, satisfies the restrictions on habeas corpus relief imposed by Congress in 28 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:48 am by John Elwood
Bell, a habeas petitioner must obtain a certificate of appealability to appeal district court orders denying discovery and DNA testing; (2) whether the Eighth Circuit’s practice of issuing summary denials of certificates of appealability violates 28 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 1:34 pm by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit denied relief, leading Edwards to seek Supreme Court review. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 8:17 am by Juan C. Antúnez
The 2d DCA concluded the trial court should have considered extrinsic evidence (which it had refused to do) when ruling upon the “similarity” of the wills at issue in this case, which is directly at odds with the 5th DCA’s ruling in Wehrheim: But we must part company with the Fifth District insofar as Wehrheim would preclude a probate court from considering extrinsic evidence when deciding the doctrine’s applicability in claims… [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 9:22 am by Joe Consumer
District judge and two separate three-judge panels of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals that have rejected BP's effort to rewrite its own negotiated settlement. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:14 am
However, that case is distinguishable because appellants did raise a general ex post facto challenge before the district court. [read post]