Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 16,701
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
China, the United States, and Russia are left to squander muscle as they will, always subject to the legitimating judgment of this superego. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 4:17 am
The Supreme Court held in Davis v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 1:41 am
Therefore if a mark lacks distinctive character in all Member States, the mark can only be registered if it has acquired distinctive character in the whole of the European Union (Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM, C‑98/11 P, EU:C:2012:307, [61] and [63]).It does not necessarily follow that distinctive character needs to be proven in each Member State. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:02 am
Finally, here are the undisputed facts: Defendant was on a cross-country road trip and, coming from California, stopped in downtown Portland late in the day. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm
But why do such figures, whether in the United States or other democracies, rarely get close to the highest levels of power? [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:11 pm
Facts: This case (EDMOND v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:31 am
In Zhang v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 4:19 am
Sure, New Mexico is to the West, but today we cross the Sabine for our musical interlude. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:00 am
For Part I click here, for Part II click here, for Part III click here, for Part IV click here, for Part V click here, for Part VI click here. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm
Thus, not only would proponents of liberal constitutional change need to secure ratification from all states where she crossed the 40% mark – a group including states such as Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas – they also would have to pick up five states that voted more than three-to-two against Senator Clinton. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 4:29 pm
At the end of the day of cross-examination of Zegers, Ms Ballit returned. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 6:50 am
United States (D.D.C.): 79-1 Forest County Motion for Summary J 81-1 US Cross Motion 82-1 Menominee Cross Motion 86 Forest County Reply 91 US Reply 92 Menominee Reply 95 DCT Order Prior posts here. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 6:45 am
Recently, in the unpublished appellate decision of Devorak v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 4:26 am
& Community Renewal, 66 AD3d at 682; JCD Farms v Juul-Nielsen, 300 AD2d at 446; Plotkin v New York City Tr. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 8:10 am
In the 2013 decision Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 6:03 am
Maryland v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 3:43 am
For one thing, the appellate court unanimously reversed the lower court’s order insofar as it denied his cross-motion to require his siblings to reimburse FEI for legal fees it paid in defense of the dissolution claim. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:25 am
’“ 3) International Investment Arbitration, the European Patent Office, and the Future Unified Patent Court by Thomas Musmann “Since the Eli Lilly v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:20 am
’“ 3) International Investment Arbitration, the European Patent Office, and the Future Unified Patent Court by Thomas Musmann “Since the Eli Lilly v. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 12:17 am
Since then, some universities, such as Washington State University, have avoided having the accuser submit to cross-examination by not having her participate in the preceding at all. [read post]
