Search for: "Degree v. United States" Results 4601 - 4620 of 6,520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2012, 2:33 pm by Liz Campbell
Surveillance is of critical importance in the investigation of serious and organised crime, in determining the extent and patterns of criminal behaviour, and in the gathering of evidence to construct a case against a suspect; thus it has been described as one of the most important legal weapons deployed by the United States against Mafia groups and families (see Jacobs, Busting the Mob: United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by admin
United States is whether a defendant has the ability to consult with his attorney with “a reasonable degree of rational understanding” and whether the defendant has a rational and factual understanding of the proceeding. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:29 pm by Matthew Flinn
Essentially, Carnwath LJ endorsed the application of the test set by the European Court in A v United Kingdom and elucidated in AF (No. 3). [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am by INFORRM
He then proceeded consider the case law from Ontario and other Canadian jurisdictions, as well as the United States, England and Wales, Australia and New Zealand. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:13 am
Succeeding on a dilution claim against a small competitor without a meaningful market presence is made more difficult with this decision, notwithstanding the change in law designed to avoid this type of outcome, which was enacted subsequent to the United States Supreme Court's decision in the seminal Victoria's Secret case. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:10 pm
Supreme Court case about the presidential war power, Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:22 am by Jamison Koehler
United States, a decision handed down on February 2 by the D.C. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:20 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
  The most iconic case about presidential war power, Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:14 am by Leland E. Beck
– Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart, before the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:08 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
  The inventor-friendly principles that governed the original United States Patent Office back when Thomas Jefferson ran it (though he personally wasn’t too much a fan of patents) are still the law today, even though the scope of prior art in most industries has expanded far beyond the point where any patent examiner could reasonably review it, much less ensure an inventor in an ex parte proceeding fairly describes it. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:30 am by azatty
After college he served in the United States Marine Corps as an infantry platoon commander from 1967 to 1969. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
  The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit determined that the casino was only “theoretically” capable of maritime transport because it is: indefinitely moored to the land by lines tied to steel pilings. [read post]