Search for: "Doe VI "
Results 4601 - 4620
of 5,651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
The gist of this position seems to be that the president’s actions are abhorrent—indeed, the caucus seems to have settled on the belief that they are likely criminal—but that this does not require that the House take formal steps toward impeachment. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am
Panel VI. [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:44 am
Does history reflect a move from diversity to unity or an ongoing conflict between the two? [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
A medicinal product whose active ingredients are TD and another therapeutic agent such as emtricitabine in combination is not protected by the Patent within the meaning of Article 3(a) because the combination, as distinct from TD, does not embody the inventive advance of the Patent. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:13 pm
All FMLA absences for the same qualifying reason are considered a single leave and employee eligibility as to that reason for leave does not change during the applicable 12-month period. (2) The eligibility notice must state whether the employee is eligible for FMLA leave as defined in §825.110. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
Amazon.com DOES target the UK when it makes it as “painless” as possible for UK consumers to buy from itLifestyle Equities v Amazon UK Services Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 552 (May 2022)The first instance decision in this case appeared in Volume IX. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 10:03 am
(Pix Source HERE)This Blog Essay site devotes every February to a series of integrated but short essays on a single theme. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 12:00 am
The admissibility of the appealIn view of the facts set out at points I, V and VI above, the board finds that the appeal satisfies the admissibility criteria under the EPC and is thus admissible.2. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:33 am
Editor’s note: Over the next week, Lawfare will be running a series of essays on federalist governance in the Middle East. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
That responsibility remains a negligence duty of care, as eliminating the traditional negligence standard of proof would “ill-serve” the public:This consideration, however, does not justify the courts in lowering the standards of proof in tort cases of this kind. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 5:11 pm
We worked together to get the Department of Public Safety to change its rules vis-a-vis the driver responsibility surcharge which is an extra civil penalty that drivers must pay for three years on top of fines for DWIs and certain traffic tickets. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Perhaps “prudence” dictates waiting until such a bill of particulars can be presented, but the theoretical case for what I call “Wilsonian self-determination” does not depend on oppression. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:28 am
If during the priority year a European patent application - filed by applicant A - is transferred to a party B, is then the priority claim from a subsequent application (from which the patent in suit matured) by applicant A to the earlier application valid? [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm
Below is an article of mine published in Family Law Journal in July of this year, reproduced with kind permission of Jordans. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
But, to stir up trouble, I find myself pondering now: What metric should be used to identify a ‘good’ trademark lawyer vis-a-vis other trademark lawyers (at least in the context of prosecution)? [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
… Part VI: Freedom of religion in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms As explained above, the majority of challenges to the desecration of Aboriginal sacred sites have proceeded under section 35 of the Constitution and/or specific statutes (eg planning or forestry legislation) and they have largely failed. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:01 am
In Doe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
” Does this instruction extend to non-GAAP financial information that does not relate to the disclosure of target levels, but is nevertheless included in Compensation Discussion & Analysis (CD&A) or other parts of the proxy statement — for example, to explain how pay is structured and implemented to reflect the registrant’s or a named executive officer’s performance? [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:04 am
Updated H-V, 2.7 instead instructs examiners to issue summons to oral proceedings if an applicant does not implement the requested description amendments. [read post]
