Search for: "Doe v. Doe" Results 4601 - 4620 of 152,593
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2014, 7:46 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
The excessive fee cases presented this dynamic perfectly, with early decisions, such as Hecker v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:36 am by Diana L. Skaggs
Garber was modified, but the modification does not affect the holding. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part VI turns to whether the Supreme Court’s ruling in this case will also have some bearing on the fact that the law does not currently recognize that surface and groundwater are hydrologically connected. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part VI turns to whether the Supreme Court’s ruling in this case will also have some bearing on the fact that the law does not currently recognize that surface and groundwater are hydrologically connected. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part VI turns to whether the Supreme Court’s ruling in this case will also have some bearing on the fact that the law does not currently recognize that surface and groundwater are hydrologically connected. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part VI turns to whether the Supreme Court’s ruling in this case will also have some bearing on the fact that the law does not currently recognize that surface and groundwater are hydrologically connected. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part VI turns to whether the Supreme Court’s ruling in this case will also have some bearing on the fact that the law does not currently recognize that surface and groundwater are hydrologically connected. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part VI turns to whether the Supreme Court’s ruling in this case will also have some bearing on the fact that the law does not currently recognize that surface and groundwater are hydrologically connected. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 5:20 am
Butters, FAIA, JD, Shareholder,Keranen & Associates, P.C.On May 31, 2007, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued its final opinion in Miller v Allstate Ins Co, 2007 Mich App LEXIS 1441. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 11:16 am
Serving disciplinary charges on an employee in a disciplinary probation period status does not preclude his or her summary terminationMatter of Nieves-Diaz v City of New York, 37 AD3d 356After being served with disciplinary charges while serving a disciplinary probation period, New York City Police Detective Luis Nieves-Diaz was summarily terminated from the Department without being given a pre-termination hearing on those charges.In response to Nieves-Diaz’s appeal… [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:30 am
Finding different employees guilty of the same misconduct does not require the appointing authority's imposing the same penalty on the individualsMeagher v Safir, 272 AD2d 114One of the issues in the Justin Meagher’s appeal from the disciplinary penalty imposed upon him by the New York City Commissioner of Police was that his punishment was the forfeiture of ten days of vacation while the penalty imposed on another officer involved in the same event was the loss of five… [read post]