Search for: "Doe v. Doe"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 152,596
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
The concept made sense back in 1984, when the Supreme Court held in Chevron v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 2:40 am
Judge Wendy Beetlestone just denied a critical motion to dismiss in De Piero v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 12:09 am
Does it matter that in this case it concerns claims that have been instituted on the basis of Article 3:305a of the Dutch Civil Code by a legal ent [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:43 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 7:56 pm
See Nken v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm
In Zauderer v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:17 pm
Justice Trivedi, in her judgement, held that lack of approval under Section 17A does not vitiate proceedings against a public servant. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
See https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-deutsche-telekom-ag. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
See https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-deutsche-telekom-ag. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 11:11 am
Campfield v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 10:43 am
The Court of Appeals (Lohier, Robinson and Nathan) does not see it that way. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am
In this sense, a somewhat similar – though dated (by that meaning: pre-Infopaq [IPKat here and here]) – case litigated both in France and the UK cannot but come to mind: Hyperion Records v Sawkins [IPKat here], concerning copyright protection of a ‘reconstructed’ baroque music score.Let’s break the referral down before discussing its potential relevance and implications, including for Artificial Intelligence (AI).BackgroundProfessor Dan Slușanschi was a… [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:05 am
See Nguyen v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
This year the Texas Supreme Court decided Van Dyke v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:38 am
Burch v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In Danco Laboratories, L.L.C. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Further, prevailing at a name-clearing hearing does not entitle the individual to reinstatement or to reemployment in his or her former position. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Further, prevailing at a name-clearing hearing does not entitle the individual to reinstatement or to reemployment in his or her former position. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:40 am
Georgia Gwinnett County Superior Court Judge Tracie Cason's decision last week in Walters v. [read post]