Search for: "Ex Parte May"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 11,461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2017, 8:45 am
As part of the asset management function, the executor may have to liquidate or run a business or manage a securities portfolio. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 10:32 am
Someone who repeatedly takes an ex-spouse to court about a pet may, in fact, be using the pet merely as an excuse to harass or control his or her ex. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 9:17 am
You may care to listen? [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 5:39 am
” Not all ex-cons, but ex-cons of a color other than orange. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 11:19 am
You may never want to see your ex again, but when you have kids, that’s not an option. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 3:47 pm
It is the defendant’s argument that since he took an Alford-Serrano plea, whereby he maintained his innocence, yet acknowledged that the prosecutor may have been able to obtain a conviction, it should not be used against him in calculating his classification as a "sex offender" pursuant to the SORA. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 12:13 pm
His ex wife may never have received State Benefits and may never have made a CSA application.Who did then? [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 3:36 pm
Audits may occur due to former employee complaints, randomly or on a profile basis. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:21 am
And finally, having read through this list, you may be thinking that your ex should be responsible for some or all of these costs. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 9:45 am
There are benefits to plea agreements that may make you want to consider one, as long as you’re getting a legally acceptable deal. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 1:21 am
When the company explored the situation, it discovered the male employee had a lengthy criminal history involving alcohol abuse, threats to kill his ex-wife, physical acts of violence against his ex-wife, and the assault on Rowe. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:53 pm
” The court had little trouble rejecting the proposition that an employee who prevails in a blacklisting case is entitled to attorneys’ fees as part of compensatory damages. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:02 pm
We should be burnt as witches, but thankfully that part of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 did not make it through the Committee Stage in the Lords and was thus never enacted. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:03 am
While Solove looks in Part 2 for the legal solutions and framework for protecting people -- such as providing a better means for some people to bring complaints or lawsuits against those that expose private information -- part of the solution may itself lie in the change of norms that would come with the full appreciation of the destructive power of the Part 1 stories. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:44 pm
Why aren’t judges pushing DHS to do a better job of demonstrating their cases on an ex parte basis? [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 9:39 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:21 am
It is very important to look into various stages and issues when the borrower prefers an appeal under section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and those are as follows:When the borrower prefers an Appeal under section 17 against the Bank, the DRT can grant ex-parte stay of proceedings against the Bank if there is sufficient ground to that affect from the averments in the ‘Grounds of Appeal’ and also the documents produced. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:21 am
It is very important to look into various stages and issues when the borrower prefers an appeal under section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and those are as follows:When the borrower prefers an Appeal under section 17 against the Bank, the DRT can grant ex-parte stay of proceedings against the Bank if there is sufficient ground to that affect from the averments in the ‘Grounds of Appeal’ and also the documents produced. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:21 am
" Here, the total value range reported under the Sum of the Parts analysis was $7.74 to $10.42 and the ex-corporate valuation range, which excluded the costs of running Micromet, was $8.92 to $11.60. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 1:22 pm
Prior to this new addition, the only ways to challenge the validity of a patent were to see ex parte or inter partes reexamination before the Patent Office. [read post]
