Search for: "Ex Parte United States"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 5,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2009, 4:42 am
Part SS of Chapter 56 2009 of the State of New York relates to the organization, function, powers, and duties of Local Conditional Release Commission. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:05 pm
The court ordered he be housed in a medical unit of the jail until he is transferred to prison. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:46 pm
§ 112 ¶ 1 for lack of written description (Ex parte Kubin). [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:05 am
[Not at all surprising after Ex parte Moreno or Abdul-Kabir. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 6:02 am
It is time for the United States to do just that - to grant the Uighurs asylum within U.S. borders. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 9:52 am
He claims that part of Pfizer's $2.3 billion deal with the feds includes a promise that the feds will not name Pfizer in connection with off-label Bextra sales ever again. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 7:49 am
In plain language, the current policy is stupid, and the people who argue in favor of its retention are worse than stupid, because they are betraying the national security interests of the United States. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:38 am
Judge Greenaway did God's work as an Assistant United States Attorney in Newark, New Jersey for five years before he was lured away by Johnson & Johnson, where he tended to the needs of Big Pharma as in-house counsel. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 1:13 am
Blackwater recently lost most of its Iraq related security contracts with the US Government, in large part due to significant bad press in the United States stemming from several shootings of civilians in Iraq. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:00 pm
Gennady Padalka, a veteran Russian cosmonaut, says that space officials from Russia, the United States and other countries now require cosmonauts and astronauts to eat their own food and follow stringent rules on access to other facilities, including lavatories. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:07 pm
But the proper place for the resolution of these conflicts is Congress, where the interested parties can present their arguments, not ex parte proceedings and default judgments in the federal district courts. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(IPKat) Germany Regional Court Munich I partly rejects Bavarian state government’s attempt to use copyright laws to prevent reprints of Nazi newspaper by British publisher Peter McGee (IPKat) (The IP Factor) India Delhi High Court restores PPL’s right to sue for copyright infringement on behalf of its members: PPL v Hotel Gold Regency & Ors (Spicy IP) Punitive damages as effective penalty (International Law Office) Religion and IP: The tales… [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Sentence is remanded for resentencing in light of Amendment 709 to the United States Sentencing Guideline U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, March 19, 2009 US v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 7:05 am
U.S. ex rel. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 11:46 pm
Thus, there is reason to question whether the United States is acting in accordance with the laws of war it claims as authority.Additionally, to cite just 2 additional concerns (our colleague Deborah Pearlstein cites others in her Opinio Juris post), yesterday's Memorandum:ââ [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Afro-IP) Peru Peru approves ratification of PCT (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Philippines Government says Philippines should be removed from US government watch list, despite claims from American lobby groups (ContentAgenda) Poland DIX versus DIX or judgment versus judgment (Class 46) PPO’s invalidates figurative mark belonging to FIRMA BATCZEW Stanislaw Komperda incorporating elements similar to EU flag (Class 46) Russia Video… [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 4:55 pm
But the states, without any expertise in this area, just muck it up with their inability to pick the best start-ups ex ante or help them develop ex post. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 10:30 pm
Douglas Grimes, the commander of the state police Megan's Law unit. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 12:15 am
Complaining that the bill is an atttempt to interfere in the internal affairs of the Church, a statement by the Diocese of Bridgeport says in part: This bill violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
