Search for: "GROUP v. STATE" Results 4601 - 4620 of 37,542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In considering the meaning of “harassment”, Rix LJ drew upon the guidance of the Court of Appeal in Thomas v News Group Newspapers where Lord Phillips defined harassment as: “conduct targeted at an individual which is calculated to produce the consequences described in section 7 and which is oppressive and unreasonable”. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 6:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
MVNY Holdings v Esses Law Group, LLC  2020 NY Slip Op 33380(U) October 15, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 153853/2019 Judge: Carol R. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:28 am by sally
Supreme Court Chaytor & Ors, R v (Rev 2) [2010] UKSC 52 (01 December 2010) Spiller & Anor v Joseph & Ors [2010] UKSC 53 (01 December 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Mullings v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2820 (01 December 2010) Webster v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2819 (01 December 2010) SB, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2620 (27 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) International Management Group (UK) Ltd v German & Anor… [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:39 am by sally
Supreme Court British Airways plc v Williams & Ors [2010] UKSC 16 (24 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Wade v Baylis [2010] EWCA Civ 257 (23 March 2010) Ahmed & Ors v Khan [2010] EWCA Civ 290 (23 March 2010) Revenue and Customs v Kearney [2010] EWCA Civ 288 (23 March 2010) Revenue and Customs v Ruas [2010] EWCA Civ 291 (23 March 2010) Oguz v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 311 (23 March… [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:16 am
The Ohio Republican Party today filed an amended complaint in its case against Secretary of State Brunner (Ohio Republican Party v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:16 am
The Ohio Republican Party today filed an amended complaint in its case against Secretary of State Brunner (Ohio Republican Party v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:32 pm by Howard Friedman
Annucci, (2d Cir., July 10, 2018), the 2nd Circuit, vacating and remanding a district court decision, held that the state had not carried its burden under RLUIPA to justify not accommodating the dietary restrictions imposed by an inmate's Nazarite Jewish faith.In Riley v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The latest installment in our continuing coverage of the Lago Agrio litigation is Patton Boggs LLP v. [read post]