Search for: "HARDING v. HAND"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 6,600
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2012, 3:27 am
That all came crashing down when the Supreme Court decided State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:27 am
Monday’s oral argument suggests that the Court is not at all certain where it will come out in Kappos v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 5:02 pm
So I’m hoping that readers will be equally amused by an export law forfeiture case that is titled United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
Systems of military commissions attempted in both the November 2001 Military Order and the 2006 Military Commissions Act (“2009 Act”) were flawed, and we have worked hard on reforms—reforms spurred by all three branches of our government. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:27 am
On September 23, 2009, the trial court sentenced Williamson to “four years imprisonment at hard labor”, after which he appealed. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 3:45 am
This type of valuation considers hard assets, such as furnishings, fixtures, and equipment, cash on hand and accounts receivable. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
It should be noted that Texas made no effort to comply with the one person-one vote mandate of Baker v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:40 pm
There's a tiff going on in the econ blogosphere that makes the recent Romano/Bainbridge v Coffee kefuffle look tame. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:37 am
Brown (striking down videogame censorship) and U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:16 am
In Judulang v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 7:34 pm
#wishlist ef436: While I doubt that much will get done in Washington in 2012 – I’d like to see a balanced budget – with some emphasis on finding and allocating funds for areas and programs that are really in need, such as education mklimpel: My wish list for Congress includes term limits – I think the whole idea of making a career out of being a senator or representative has caused the gridlock we are experiencing – politicians are avoiding making hard choices… [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 4:10 am
As for the Times' endorsement, only two facts make the conclusion hard to swallow. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:05 pm
Accordingly, the slight differences in actions and words of Obama v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
#1 — DiCosolo v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 6:49 pm
Waller v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:19 am
The details are different, but every GOP candidate has attacked federal judges for decades (ever since, at least, Brown v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
Hard evidence must be advanced to prove individual harm. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
For a sense of just how badly wrong Marc is about the scope of the First Amendment, consider the recent dismissal of the twitter-stalking case in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:11 am
On January 9, in Kappos v. [read post]
