Search for: "High v State" Results 4601 - 4620 of 35,497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2012, 12:26 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
The case involved the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, where the EPA was trying to regulate the amount of pollution states could dump on other, “downwind” states. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 12:01 am by Jeanne Huang
Dhanjibhai, the Bombay High court upheld the English rule of lex situs for the succession of property situated in India. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Brasier, Detroit Free Press] Case against deference: “Now More Than Ever, Courts Should Police Administrative Agencies” [Ilya Shapiro on Perez v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:49 am by Eugene Volokh
But this doesn’t apply to private schools, even if the private schools get various government benefits (see Rendell-Baker v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  Where a state breaches the ECHR, a Court set up by signatory members – the European Court of Human Rights (which has nothing to do with the European Union) – can order a state to pay an aggrieved citizen compensation. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 11:28 pm
The Court expects that the new limits will cover 90 percent of the state's child-support cases. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
Eugene Kontorovich passes along the news about United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court heard oral arguments in a trio of high-profile civil-rights cases involving LBGT employees: consolidated cases Bostock v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 5:30 am by Mary T. Costigan and Maya Atrakchi
Recently, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), EU’s high court, issued an important opinion that addresses website cookie use Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 8:04 am
" And The Associated Press reports that "Supreme Court avoids major ruling in birth control dispute" and "High court says investor lawsuit can remain in state court. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:30 pm by Sme
Levinski (10th Cir., June 29, 2015) (affirming Rock's dismissal because her right to free speech did not overcome Levinski's concern that those in high-ranking policy positions should "speak publicly with a single voice on policy matters")Teufel v. [read post]