Search for: "Johns v. State" Results 4601 - 4620 of 19,704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm by Victoria Kwan
Two decades after writing the landmark United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
” [Ilya Shapiro and Matthew Larosiere on Cato-joined amicus brief in Christie v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews the cases the Supreme Court relisted after the long conference. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm by Theodore Ruger
   As Chief Justice John Roberts presciently noted in his NIFB majority:  “The States are separate and independent sovereigns. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday the justices heard argument in Knick v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Hyatt, in which the court overruled a 40-year-old precedent and held that a state cannot be sued in the courts of another state without its consent. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:04 pm
A Utah prison official, John Powers, testified regarding Schad's personal development and conduct while he was incarcerated in Utah state prison after a prior offense. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood previews next Monday’s relists. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:01 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Dec. 4 conference) United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relisted cases. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Beth Graham
Alito, Jr. wrote the majority opinion, which was joined in by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage of the solicitor general’s motion in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:30 am by Sean Wajert
John Deere Co., 494 U.S. 516, 523 (1990) ( § 1404(a) transfer does not change the law applicable in a diversity case); Eggleton v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 2:58 pm by Mark Walsh
As the first substantive day of the impeachment trial wore on, and on, from yesterday into the early morning hours of today, one cable-TV pundit suggested that Chief Justice John Roberts might not feel compelled to attend today’s oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]