Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 4601 - 4620 of 15,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2007, 1:14 am
If you are already an online subscriber to this service you should be able to click on any of the links provided below, sign in, and access any of the decisions listed which interest you Click here to go to www.nylj.com APPELLATE DIVISIONSECOND DEPARTMENTCivil Practice‘High-Low' Agreements in Civil Trials for Damages Constitute Settlements, Are Enforceable as Such Cunha, appellant v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 10:49 am by Michael M. O'Hear
One question that I was particularly interested in exploring was whether Minnesota’s admirable sentencing guidelines should get the credit for the state’s relatively low incarceration rate. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:04 pm by Michael O'Hear
One question that I was particularly interested in exploring was whether Minnesota’s admirable sentencing guidelines should get the credit for the state’s relatively low incarceration rate. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:09 pm
The California Court of Appeal’s recent decision in FLIR Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 1:50 am by Florian Mueller
ZTE resolves the proportionality part at the same time.However, Judge Voss noted that defendants in a smartphone SEP case might argue that low-income customers would be deprived of access to sub-€100 smartphones if an injunction was enforced, and that kind of third-party interest is outside the scope of the Huawei v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am by INFORRM
  The ECtHR held that a low domestic limit on privacy damages was incompatible with Article 8 and awarded “just satisfaction” of €6,500. [read post]