Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 4601 - 4620
of 21,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
They filed suit in mid-December alleging a variety of federal and state trademark violations including infringement, dilution by blurring, dilution by tarnishment, and false designation of origin. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Would that be reviewable by a court, given that it involves a question of the validity to state law? [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 9:14 am
See also JCRA v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:02 pm
” Ermini v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
It considers how the test is applied by national trade mark registries across EU member states, by the EUIPO, by national courts, and by the CJEU. [read post]
31 May 2017, 11:45 am
” Judge Kavanaugh’s 10-page opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 10:46 am
” (internal quotation marks omitted)); see also Polk Cnty. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:49 am
Rescuecom Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 9:18 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
Brief for United States 47–48. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 1:21 am
"
State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:56 pm
Magistrate Judge Mark R. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 11:44 am
Christie v. [read post]
Case Law, Canada: Baglow v Smith, defence of “fair comment” succeeds in landmark blogging libel case
4 Mar 2015, 4:50 pm
Simpson; 2008 SCC 40, Grant v Torstar Corp , Grant 2009 SCC 61 and Crookes v. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 2:18 am
Trans USA Products, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 3:48 am
Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. iMove, Inc., No. 17 C 8021, Slip Op. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am
This has recently been developed from an understanding of the right as being a relatively narrow one, which is to do with receiving information that others are willing to impart (found in Leander v Sweden (1987) EHRR 43), to a relatively broad one, which now encompasses receiving information held by an organ of the state, free of unjustified administrative obstacles (found in Tarsasag a Szabadsagjogokert v Hungary (2009) ECHR 618 and Kenedi v Hungary (2009) ECHR… [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:02 am
Just affirmed.Ditto for some of the "headnote" markings that are part of the summary. [read post]
