Search for: "People v. Keys" Results 4601 - 4620 of 8,121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2009, 11:34 am
  Introduction A key battle over America’s healthcare future is being fought in one of the most unlikeliest of places: Urbana, Illinois. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 11:48 pm
There is also insufficient evidence to justify indiscriminate prescribing of Crestor to people with normal cholesterol levels. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 12:44 pm
Rev. 480 (1990), has been cited for the proposition that the brief that Dawn Johnsen wrote in Webster v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 5:41 am
Rid your mind of any concept of the Constitution as a democratic document, expressing the political will of the people, as expressed in Marbury v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Optimism seems key: painters thought they had 52.8% chance of winning the prize. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
However, the Chinese Supreme People’s Court has confirmed that the Chinese courts have jurisdiction to hear the case, even in the absence of agreement between the parties as to the forum in which terms are to be determined and without any patent infringement claim. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am by Florian Mueller
Further below you can find a very long list of items in the evidentiary record of Oracle v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Garcia, No. 07-40245 A conviction for drug-related offenses is reversed and remanded for a new trial where: 1) during rebuttal closing argument, the government improperly bolstered its key witnesses, the agents who heard defendant's unrecorded confession; and 2) such bolstering constituted reversible plain error, which seriously affected the fairness, integrity, and public reputation of the proceedings. [read post]