Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 44,345
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2012, 12:40 pm
Here's the abstract: In Lyng v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 11:56 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 2:30 am
Pro-Football, Inc., 50 USPQ2d 1705 (TTAB 1999), finding that the marks "may be disparaging of Native Americans to a substantial composite of this group of people," and "may bring Native Americans into contempt or disrepute" in violation of Section 2(a). [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
In Chimel v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:15 am
Key Statute and Precedent State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:48 am
Via Doug Berman by way of Howard Bashman from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (whew), the Georgia Supreme Court upheld sex offender registration for people convicted of non-sex related offenses in Rainer v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:27 am
People v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm
The recent libel claim in Bento v The Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police [2012] EWHC 1525 (QB) is a striking exception. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:25 am
It is well-established that a private entity has an ability to make “choices about whether, to what extent, and in what manner it will disseminate speech…” NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 11:24 am
(But see Hirel Connectors, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 10:23 am
That brings us to Nguyen v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 8:00 am
In Miles v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 8:55 pm
The case is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co v Amazon.com Services Inc 2020. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:20 am
Cohen, CRS v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:01 pm
As you probably do not recall (or never knew), in Taniguchi v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:02 am
Sackett shows that when an agency sanctions someone, even if they do so preliminarily, that person may be able to sue in court to get the sanction overturned. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 3:35 pm
Tims v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am
That may well be true. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:20 am
In a recent case evaluating the discrimination claims of a 59-year-old California woman, Earl v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:20 am
In a recent case evaluating the discrimination claims of a 59-year-old California woman, Earl v. [read post]
