Search for: "People v. More"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 43,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2022, 7:16 am
For more on the Arnstein case, see this blog post. [read post]
24 May 2016, 11:30 pm
For more information, please see a Hogan Lovells client alert on the ruling, available here. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 3:24 pm
The Sixth Circuit provided some more clarity this week in a handful of published and unpublished cases. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 3:31 pm
I feel like most of the cases with the caption "Union Pacific R.R. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:58 pm
(See People v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
The Explanatory Notes refer to Thornton (cited above) and Jameel v The Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2003] EWCA Civ 1694. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:10 pm
A trust is a legal agreement in which a person (called a Grantor) states that one or more people (called Trustees) hold the Grantor’s assets for certain people (called the beneficiaries) subject to certain duties and the terms of the agreement. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 10:04 am
” Amaro v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:49 am
Compare Righthaven v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:00 am
In Promatek v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 10:58 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 4:45 am
State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
Generally though, this makes it very hard for people to tell consumers that their products are like trade marked products in some respect.]IPKat concluding commentIf Intel was the low point of Art.5(2) protection for trade mark owners then this has got to be the high point, particularly when taken in conjunction with the approach to comparative advertising. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:00 am
More likely, he did not care. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:42 am
Indeed, in PETA Deutschland v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 12:01 am
However, seven people piled into a vehicle intended for no more than five. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 2:34 pm
By Eric Goldman Finkel v. [read post]
MORE TRAPS FOR THE UNWARY: Marine Faces Fifteen Years Behind Bars for Unknowingly Violating Gun Law…
3 Jan 2012, 7:08 am
Go read Heart of Atlanta Motel and Katzenbach v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:27 am
Every decision the justices make trickles down to change our laws and rights as we know them now -- like privacy rights.Today is the anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Roe v. [read post]
