Search for: "People v. Wills" Results 4601 - 4620 of 5,074
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Indeed, unless a given jurisdiction has the requisite market power, it is likely to make itself worse-off on balance, not just the people in other jurisdictions, by reason of imposing them. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
  Most people see the negotiations as an implicit concession that the material is protected by copyright (or by some other type of intellectual property). [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
Our disagreement – not a small one -- is whether We the People only did great things during the Golden Age before the New Deal. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 8:52 pm by Josh Blackman
The purpose of a record is to demonstrate what a person was willing to publicly do with their profession. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:35 am
Rogovoy stated: "I never mentioned any of the people: the defendant, the witnesses. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:57 am by Peter Mahler
The seemingly neat distinction between the application of DLOC and DLOM, on the one hand, under the FMV standard derived from appraisal doctrine in non-statutory appraisal proceedings (allowed) and, on the other hand, the FV standard derived from legislative/judicial edict in statutory buyout proceedings (generally not allowed), came under attack in a recent California intermediate appellate court’s 2-1 decision in Pourmoradi v Gabbai. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:07 pm
  Since section 112 only addresses the termination of service contracts, this amendment really isn't  absolutely necessary, and this is especially so in light of  Justice Paul Perel's decision in the case of PSCC No. 668 v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Juan C. Antúnez
According to some really smart people the Uniform Directed Trust Act’s solved this liability problem as well as all the other ancillary issues that come with these new split-duty relationships. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:35 am
Rogovoy stated: "I never mentioned any of the people: the defendant, the witnesses. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 6:13 am
Reported at Robert Ambrogi's Lawsites and The IllinoisTrial Practice Weblog.And now on with the rest of the submissions for this week's Blawg Review.The most highly talked about topic this past week was the Supreme Court's ruling on punitive damage awards in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:08 am by Ira Meislik
In the actual case, the tenant didn’t want a five year renewal and was willing to vacate the premises if it couldn’t get a three year renewal. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:25 pm
Kornowicz's "spouse" despite repeated requests from the school district, leading to this lawsuit, Kornowicz & Higgins v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 11:02 pm by Colin Murray
Last year’s Court of Human Rights judgment in Ponomaryov v Bulgaria did affirm (at [56]) that the right did not necessarily have the same effect at all levels of education and that, “at the University level, which so far remains optional for many people, higher fees for aliens – and indeed fees in general – seem to be commonplace and can, in the present circumstances, be considered fully justified. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:02 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
 The petition relies on the 1980′s decision in Harper and Row v. [read post]