Search for: "Read v. United States" Results 4601 - 4620 of 30,064
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 9:12 pm by David Kemp
In the case, Supap Kirtsaeng, a college student from Thailand studying in the United States, launched a small online business selling textbooks. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 7:38 pm by Thompson & Knight LLP
Jevic Holding Corp., the United States Supreme Court made clear that bankruptcy courts cannot approve structured dismissals that provide for distributions in violation of the Bankruptcy Code’s priority scheme without the consent of the affected parties.[1]  For an in-depth analysis of the Jevic decision, please read our previous blog post by clicking here. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 7:38 pm by Thompson & Knight LLP
Jevic Holding Corp., the United States Supreme Court made clear that bankruptcy courts cannot approve structured dismissals that provide for distributions in violation of the Bankruptcy Code’s priority scheme without the consent of the affected parties.[1]  For an in-depth analysis of the Jevic decision, please read our previous blog post by clicking here. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
The Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett v EPA, announced on May 25, 2023, was unanimous in that the EPA’s wetlands regulatory jurisdiction is limited to wetlands with a continuous surface connection to the waters of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:41 am by Adam Wagner
Garry Norman MANN v Portugual and the United Kingdom – 360/10 [2011] ECHR 337 (1 February 2011) – Read judgment Garry Mann, a football fan who was convicted to two years in a Portuguese jail for rioting after an England match in 2004, has lost his appeal to the European Court of Human Rights against his conviction and extradition. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 2:41 pm
Stanford student Anthony Dick summarizes Monday’s argument in Horne v. [read post]
  However, the union claimed that decades of NLRB case law was unconstitutional and that its activity was protected as free speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution pursuant to Reed v. [read post]