Search for: "Root v. State"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 4,651
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2007, 8:48 am
I just read "Freakonomics" where the author attributes most of this drop to Roe V. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 7:44 am
Indeed, in Bryan v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:46 am
District Court case, Andrews v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 9:15 pm
Drew v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 6:21 am
State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 9:39 am
This: Habeas corpus is, however, “a writ antecedent to statute, ... throwing its root deep into the genius of our common law.” Williams v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 7:30 am
Circuit will rehear en banc, the case of Abigail Alliance v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 4:34 pm
The Court, in Omar v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
The Roots of the Law, Where they are Found and Best Illustrated in Both the Old and the Latest Cases, the Great Maxims, General Principles and Leading Cases, the Six Leading Subjects in Miniature: Equity, Procedure, Contract, Crime, Tort and Construction... [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 9:00 pm
DeBenedetto v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:13 pm
.
'MedImmune v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 1:31 am
This is clearly a second root cause fueling an anti-patent attitude. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 2:23 pm
Ct. at 1381, quoting United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 6:59 am
Blog contributor Lauren Weldon and a few friends attended a Federalist Society debate titled, "Can Originalists Defend Brown v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 5:02 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 6:04 am
Furman v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 10:13 am
The United States, for example, has the U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 9:44 pm
" Here is the abstract:This paper 1) notices that Booker uprooted the statutory basis for the departure concept, suggesting that courts are at liberty to deviate from precedent rooted in the pre-Booker concept; 2) explains why Rule 32(i)(1)(C) as read by Burns v United States requires notice prior to sua sponte non-Guidelines sentences in those jurisdictions that require a distinct legal determination if a non-Guidelines sentence is warranted; and 3) discusses… [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 11:46 am
I am pleased to see the Second Circuit Sentencing Blog is back in action, and especially happy it noted Judge Jack Weinstein's latest Booker work in US v. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:58 pm
See Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae at 26, Watters v. [read post]
