Search for: "Samuels"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 14,798
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2019, 6:31 pm
Today an amicus brief was filed in the Affordable Care Act case in the Fifth Circuit, on behalf of Kevin Walsh, Michael McConnell, and me. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:31 pm
A new amicus brief in the Fifth CircuitToday an amicus brief was filed in the Affordable Care Act case in the Fifth Circuit, on behalf of Kevin Walsh, Michael McConnell, and me. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:45 pm
• Samuel N. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:45 pm
• Samuel N. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:00 am
Samuels v Birmingham City Council, heard 31 Jan 2019. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
Research and Resources The Divergent Paths of Commonwealth Privacy Torts, Supreme Court Law Review, vol. 84(2d), pp. 225-267, , 2018), Samuel Beswick and William Fotherby, Harvard University, Law School and Independent Rethinking Liability Rules for Online Hosting Platforms, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn – Universität Mannheim, Discussion Paper Series – CRC TR 224 (2019), Miriam C. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 9:24 am
And unlike the position adopted by Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito, which was so broad that it would render it impossible to distinguish coercion from the offer of a lifetime, the Chief Justice's position had the critical legal virtue of being professionally responsible.What does it say about the times in which we are living that the only Justice who voted against ideological and partisan interest on most of the constitutional questions in… [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 9:20 am
Siegel is also right to point out that the GOP's refusal to hold hearings on Garland differed only in degree from voting him down and doing the same to any other Obama nominee the Republicans considered too liberal. i would add that it was also little different from what then-Senator Barack Obama and many other Democrats unsuccessfully tried to do in 2006 with the nomination of Samuel Alito: prevent a vote from occurring by using the filibuster (a move Obama later said he regretted). [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 9:20 am
Siegel is also right to point out that the GOP’s refusal to hold hearings on Garland differed only in degree from voting him down and doing the same to any other Obama nominee the Republicans considered too liberal. i would add that it was also little different from what then-Senator Barack Obama and many other Democrats unsuccessfully tried to do in 2006 with the nomination of Samuel Alito: prevent a vote from occurring by using the filibuster (a move Obama later said he regretted). [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 2:04 pm
If you want a brief overview of remedies in American private law, here’s one I recently prepared. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 2:04 pm
If you want a brief overview of remedies in American private law, here's one I recently prepared. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 9:24 am
The case was originally presented to Justice Samuel Alito and referred by him to the full court. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 9:12 am
Samuel H. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 8:16 am
Right now, Georgetown Law’s Human Rights Institute is hosting the 2019 Samuel Dash Conference on Human Rights: “Human Rights and Today’s Vulnerable Migrants. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:13 am
Conclusion: The motion to exclude the expert witness testimony of Samuel Sero is granted. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 9:24 pm
Here is the majority opinion in full: The application for a stay of execution of sentence of death presented to JUSTICE [SAMUEL] ALITO and by him referred to the Court is granted. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 5:59 pm
Yesterday afternoon I was reading Blackstone (§ 2, Of the Nature of Laws in General), for a project on legal interpretation. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 2:06 pm
The examination that led to the investigation was conducted by Bradley Cline, Samuel Kim, John Chee, and Kenneth Schneider. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 5:39 am
Here's what EURACTIV journalist Samuel Stolton reported on Twitter today, referring to a statement on Mr. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 1:30 am
” Dissent in Garza v Idaho Justice Clarence Thomas authored a dissent, which was joined by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito in part. [read post]
