Search for: "State v. Force"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 32,531
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2015, 8:10 pm
Supreme Court engaged deeply in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:45 pm
Shortly after the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Petitioner had filed an improper practice petition with BCB alleging that the City and DOC violated New York City when DOC issued Directive 2230, entitled "Pre-Promotional Assignment Procedures" in accordance with a consent order approved by a federal district court in a case involving allegations of excessive use of force incidents in DOC facilities.* The relevant provision in Directive 2230 concerns promotions within DOC provided for (1) a review of a correction officer's… [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Petitioner had filed an improper practice petition with BCB alleging that the City and DOC violated New York City when DOC issued Directive 2230, entitled "Pre-Promotional Assignment Procedures" in accordance with a consent order approved by a federal district court in a case involving allegations of excessive use of force incidents in DOC facilities.* The relevant provision in Directive 2230 concerns promotions within DOC provided for (1) a review of a correction officer's… [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 10:34 am
Further, as seen in the case J.D. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:30 pm
However, the state continued to argue that the annotations were copyrightable since they did not carry the force of law. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 3:30 am
Margossian; and U.S. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:15 pm
Safiret wasn't cowed, responding that under Florida law avulsion is the result of natural forces. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
And further dispute arose between Sheeran's song 'Photograph' (also written by the first and third claimants; Sheeran and McDaid) and a song called 'Amazing', following which there was a settlement agreement and 35% of the PRS royalties now go to the writers of 'Amazing'.Naturally, the Claimants sought to strike out these allegations, which came before Deputy Master Jefferis on 4 June 2019 on the basis that similar fact evidence is only admissible in civil… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:28 am
Even further, where is the state interest in forced inclusion when excluded individuals have the right to form competing student groups, seek student-fee funding, and gain access to facilities? [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:03 am
Supreme Court this morning in Janus v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 5:06 am
Retail Ventures, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 7:19 am
Norris, 16 U.S.C.M.A. 574, 37 C.M.R. 194 (to be admissible, must be verbatim); United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:51 pm
In Woodhull Freedom Foundation et al. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 8:27 am
” Fasano v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:05 am
CJLF wrote an amicus brief in this case supporting Texas.It was no surprise in the case of Moore v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:38 pm
Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission (1976), bars states from regulating activity Congress intended to leave subject to the natural result of economic forces. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 9:00 am
In Canada (Privacy Commissioner) v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Sacred Heart of Jesus Parish v. [read post]
