Search for: "State v. Frame" Results 4601 - 4620 of 6,747
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2009, 9:36 am
Arnold Schwarzenegger and Corrections Secretary Matt Cate "essentially have told the court that they will reduce the state prison population as the state sees fit, to a level the state deems appropriate, and in a time frame the state has set for itself," the attorneys wrote. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:45 am by SHG
As states enact laws that permit abortions within unrealistically short time frames, the argument is that these laws include exceptions, inter alia, for the mother’s health or life. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 11:52 am by The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.
Additional Resources: Broward settles case of teen run over by bus, Feb. 1, 2017, By Brittany Wallman, The Sun Sentinel More Blog Entries: Baugh v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:21 am by WSLL
The State raises two issues:  Whether the district court arbitrarily applied the “assertion of innocence” factor of the seven-factor Frame test, in deciding that the appellant could not withdraw his guilty plea, and whether that decision was otherwise reasonable. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 8:53 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
  These amendments were required by the recent United States Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Consider this photo of a mosaic:  (sculpture by Jack Mackie, photo by Mike Hipple) Why doesn’t that change the meaning of the mosaic through the addition of the human following the steps and the framing choices that create a particular experience of the mosaic? [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:55 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Madhavi Nalluri, Associate, Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A Shroff & Co has written this descriptive post on the state of Mediation and Conciliation in India. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 5:54 am by Axel Arnbak
Interestingly, the European Court of Human Rights case-law is slowly but surely moving forward: I v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
  This means that, at trial, New Zealand plaintiffs can prosecute claims that are framed favourably towards their position. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 7:01 am by Ben Saul
This was novel at the time, since the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has long maintained, since Nicaragua v U.S. (1986), that self-defense is only available if a non-state armed group is “sent” by a government, not where a group independently attacks. [read post]