Search for: "State v. Good Bear"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 5,195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2009, 8:45 am
/**/ Flagstar Bank, FSB v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:59 am
The descriptiveness of a sign may be assessed only in relation to the relevant public’s understanding of that sign and in relation to the goods or services in question. * The relevant public in this case consisted of the average consumer of that type of goods. * The key question here is whether the average consumer, who is reasonably well informed and reasonably observant and circumspect, may think, merely on seeing a beverage which bears as a trade mark… [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:52 am
I wonder how Orin would have predicted the grant of cert, which stated the question presented as follows: Whether the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms is incorporated as against the States by the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities or Due Process Clauses. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:48 am
(1) Further undermine Roe v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
In light of this recent federal enactment, multiple state laws to the same effect, and even public opinion polls suggesting support for the death penalty in such cases, was the Court's decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:13 pm
And Slaughterhouse stands as good law to this day. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Umbro's Delaware-based subsidiary handled its business in the United States. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
Because, given the length of time that the Redskins have had the name without challenge and the delay in the plaintiffs bringing their claim, it would be unfair to deprive the football team of the profits to be made from selling goods bearing the Redskins name. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 4:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 2:40 pm
Apparently, the departure was not "all good" with her. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 8:38 am
There are those who argue that international laws and norms should have no bearing on how the United States decides to dispense justice. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 7:08 am
State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:21 am
First, we are all supposed to be good Europeans now. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:14 pm
The case is Jones v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:45 pm
"The Case Against Juvenile Life Without Parole: Good Policy and Good Law," is the title of Kristin Henning's commentary at FindLaw.com. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Relation of this Final Rule to the July 2, 2009, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking V. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:50 pm
" Video Link The People v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 1:16 pm
My last post pointed to a Columbus Bar Association press release about Columbus Bar Assn. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 10:10 am
See State Farm Insurance v. [read post]
