Search for: "State v. So "
Results 4601 - 4620
of 117,591
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2010, 2:45 pm
If so, how? [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article V bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the competent authorities in the Requested State have declined to prosecute for the acts for which extradition has been requested. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 12:26 pm
In so holding, the Court overruled Knauss v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:42 pm
The United States Supreme Court today affirmed an injunction by a three-judge panel requiring California to release prisoners so that within two years the state’s prisons are at no more than 137.5% of their designed occupancy limits. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:40 am
Citing Makowski v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 4:03 am
Belcher v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:02 am
Here, Smith admitted to shooting out the tires of the victim, but he claimed that he'd done so after everyone had already gotten out of the car. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:42 pm
Particularly when the court that's giving the compliment is the highest court in the state. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 12:39 pm
So if Mr. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:00 pm
Not so. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com)On Monday, the Supreme Court held oral argument in Murthy v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:16 am
Commentary on the Ninth Circuit (Opinion in Robinson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:12 am
Mahamdia v People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria: (Case C-154/11); [2012] WLR (D) 218 “An embassy situated in a member state of the European Union was an ‘establishment’ within the meaning of article 18(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, in the context of a dispute concerning a contract of employment concluded by the embassy on behalf of the sending state, where the functions carried out by the employee did not… [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in 2006 in Purcell v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:32 am
This was the position clearly taken by the Court in 1940, in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 12:11 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 3:04 pm
Supreme Court's admonition in State Farm v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:26 am
Barrick v. [read post]
