Search for: "State v. Stephens."
Results 4601 - 4620
of 7,110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2013, 4:44 am
While the court's earlier denial of the plaintiff's motion to preliminarily enjoin Symantec's annual say-on-pay vote (in October 2012) was welcome and important news to public companies and their advisors (especially since the same court had previously granted a shareholder's motion to preliminarily enjoin an equity plan approval vote in Stephen Knee v. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 7:38 pm
People v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:33 am
Tuesday, Ben bemoaned the state of drone-themed humor in the New York Times, and followed it up yesterday morning with a tale of national security parody gone awry. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:45 am
The case is Konowaloff v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 12:02 pm
Importantly, PHR filed an amicus brief in Al Nashiri v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
, represented the mother; Stephen J. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
[Hall v Wandsworth at 29]Mitu v Camden LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 1249 is taken as an explanation of Hall, when Lewison LJ says:Section 203 (4) distinguishes between a “decision” and an “issue”. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
[Hall v Wandsworth at 29]Mitu v Camden LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 1249 is taken as an explanation of Hall, when Lewison LJ says:Section 203 (4) distinguishes between a “decision” and an “issue”. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
At our hearing, it is not known whether judgment was rendered in this case, nor has taken cognizance; officers of the civil court would have however stated that judgment had been pronounced against him. [10] He wants to learn at the same time he read the decisions on these two claims, “to challenge” he adds. [13] Mr. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
At our hearing, it is not known whether judgment was rendered in this case, nor has taken cognizance; officers of the civil court would have however stated that judgment had been pronounced against him. [10] He wants to learn at the same time he read the decisions on these two claims, “to challenge” he adds. [13] Mr. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
This case, Koontz v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:36 am
McBride, Stephen M. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 2:57 am
Circuit Judge Rosemary Pooler of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and he then practiced law at Davis Polk & Wardwell and Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke LLP, both in New York City. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 10:04 pm
Stephens, 387 F.3d at 1226-27; United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:20 pm
The cases of Decker v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 7:30 am
Jan. 14, 2013) (involving Levaquin); Wilson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:27 pm
For more about City of Greenville v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 6:59 am
For example, as discussed by in a post by one of the premier U.S. corporate law scholars, Professor Stephen Bainbridge, New York State’s pension fund sued Qualcomm earlier this month seeking to inspect books and records detailing the use of company resources for political purposes. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
” Malibu Media, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
