Search for: "Summers v. Summers" Results 4601 - 4620 of 9,113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2014, 11:20 am by Ronald Collins
 (We posted more information about access to the Justices’ papers last summer.) [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:31 am by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch Earlier this summer, the Supreme Court decided the subject matter eligibility case of Alice Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 6:24 pm by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court, as it periodically does in the summer, released a list of miscellaneous orders. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
Primus’ Losses in “Scorched Earth” Litigation Strategy Will Create Change in Audit Industry – Retailer Responsibility Next It has been almost three long years since dusty Holly, Colorado, became the epicenter of a Listeria monocytogenes human tragedy. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:49 am by Amy Howe
The Conglomerate is hosting a symposium on last month’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
It has been almost three long years since dusty Holly, Colorado, became the epicenter of a Listeria monocytogenes human tragedy. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Bloomberg TV has an explainer on Kirby v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by INFORRM
Events Know of any media law events happening later this summer or in the autumn? [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:29 pm by Howard Knopf
Brixton’s is a great place – and the patio in the summer is particularly nice. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 9:00 am by Ashley S. O'Neill
  Recently, a Louisiana state court carefully examined the terms of a non-compete in Gulf Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 1:24 am
 You have until noon, British Summer Time, on Wednesday 23 July to let the office know: just email your thoughts to policy@ipo.gov.uk. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:06 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
With Congress on summer recess and well, Congress being Congress, that hasn’t happened. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:17 pm by Jason Rantanen
This is the Teva-update to last summer’s Patently-O Guest Post titled “Why Lighting Ballast Won’t Solve Claim Construction” (http://patentlyo.com/patent/2013/07/guest-post-why-lighting-ballast-wont-solve-claim-construction.html), which discussed two then-recently published empirical studies – a study of “close cases” (analyzing all post-Markman claim construction cases where the Federal Circuit panel was split) and a study of “reversals”… [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
“Now we really have to say,” he insisted in his annual summer interview, “this is enough. [read post]