Search for: "TOWNING v. STATE"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 5,892
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2010, 11:49 am
” Town of Burlington v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 10:42 am
Today's New York Times reports on the sorry state of a country so used to defending itself against enemies that their absence has made it turn on itself. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 2:22 am
In fact, the latest entry on this issue, Town of Islip, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of New York v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 12:48 pm
State football game. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:15 am
Repeated acts of insubordination, excessive absences and untimely completion of assigned tasks warrants termination of the employeeMatter of Gibbons v New York State Unified Ct. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:36 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 1:49 pm
First, he passes along a new medical device preemption decision, Bishoff v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:12 am
The court said “the simple answer is that, as Chief of a Town police force, [Wade] was not a State employee. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 3:20 am
Automatic termination from public office by operation of lawSchirmer v Town of Harrison, USDC, SDNY, 1999 WL 61843Foley v Bratton, Court of Appeals, 92 NY2d 781 [Decided with Griffin v Bratton]Police officers are public officers and as such a subject to the provisions of Section 30.1 of the Public Officers Law. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:14 am
” A state Supreme Court justice granted the town’s motion to dismiss the action.The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of Mitchell’s complaint. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 12:57 pm
By Aida V. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:12 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:09 pm
(I'm assuming there's no town tax, just a state decision to treat two towns differently.) [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:35 am
City of Panora v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:16 am
Hempstead v Civil Serv. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 3:54 am
[See McKee v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 5:13 pm
The town hall style program was conducted to inform the bar and policy makers of the implications of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 9:04 am
Furthermore, as to Supreme Court's finding that the proposed amendment patently lacked merit, we do not agree (see Berger v Water Commrs. of Town of Waterford, supra). [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 7:10 am
This meeting did not constitute an official IEP team meeting because several team members were out of town. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So held the Tenth Circuit on Tuesday in Sampson v. [read post]
