Search for: "United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 7,493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:55 am
The recent case of United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit William A. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit William A. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
It is unclear whether the plaintiff states will appeal this ruling. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
It is unclear whether the plaintiff states will appeal this ruling. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
” A 2-1 panel of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 4:46 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit 2001). [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:35 am
Supreme Court would not undo the undoing), but that is not the same thing as ignoring the states. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
This is an area that's changed a bit as the composition of the Court has changed.Still, Judge Callahan and the rest of the panel are generally required to follow circuit precedent. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
From there, an employee would normally appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit – a specialized appellate court that deals with certain kinds of cases (including patent and international trade) from all over the country, no matter where they originate. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am
Three courts of appeals have answered “no. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 12:44 pm
Much is being reported in the media about the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California certifying a class of drivers for the Uber ride service who contended that they were employees, not independent contractors. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:03 pm
The existing rule in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal is the same. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:54 am
On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Dist. 2023) [see § 124.08[2] n. 12.1, a state appellate court found a common practice of the state’s Appeals Board that circumvented a 60-day deadline for petitions for reconsideration by granting reconsideration “for further study” was a flagrant violation of Cal. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:59 am
Two weeks ago, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals entrenched the decision by holding that Dynamex retroactively subjects employers to liability for misclassifying their employees. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 12:20 pm
” United States v. [read post]
