Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 4601 - 4620 of 8,719
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2022, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am by John Elwood
If you’re reading a blog post that is entirely devoted to cases on the Supreme Court’s docket that haven’t even been granted yet, chances are you’re a law nerd. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other… [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
 More recently, in Fenty v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd (t/a Topshop)  [2013] EWHC 2310 (noted by the IPKat here), pop star Rihanna succeeded in her claim for passing off against retail giant Topshop, who used her image on a t-shirt without her permission. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
In briefs in both cases last month, the outgoing acting solicitor general, Jeffrey Wall, urged the justices to grant cert and vacate the court of appeals’ decisions (both of which went against Trump) under United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 7:53 am
Will there be another petition to the the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, as there was the last time plaintiff lost an appeal against another one of his no-fault carriers? [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
In Ritzen Group Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:36 am by Barry Barnett
Circuit to reject what it (C&D) deemed an extreme reading of Sherman Act section 2 -- the Third Circuit's en banc decision in LePage's Inc. v. 3M, 324 F.3d 141 (3d Cir. 2003) (en banc). [read post]