Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 4601 - 4620 of 9,859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
With this established, the district court remarked that the burden was on the defendant to show the home state exception. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am by David Kopel
” The two-step test The Second Circuit adopted the “two-step” Second Amendment test created by the 3rd Circuit in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:41 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals holds that these restrictions do not violate the Second Amendment.The case is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-1535Issue: (1) Whether prosecutors are permitted to withhold materials covered by Brady v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:32 am by Joy Waltemath
Also, while the wife claimed the iPhone was purchased after the events at issue, the court noted that when a new iPhone is purchased, it is very common for the old unit to be backed up, and then the backup is used to transfer the information from the old unit to the new iPhone. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 6:44 am by Mark S. Humphreys
A 2015, United States District Court, Austin Division, case is a good place to start for grasping the requirements. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
  As Wikipedia explains, [i]n the United States, removal jurisdiction refers to the right of a defendant to move a lawsuit filed in state court to the federal district court for the federal judicial district in which the state court sits. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:26 am by Joy Waltemath
” The next day, the employee posted disparaging remarks about the superior stating: “You embarrass me, our country, and our unit!!! [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 1:15 am by Sean O'Beirne, Kingsley Napley LLP
Where, as in Saunders v United Kingdom (1997) 23 EHRR 313 and the present case, a person is asked questions at a stage when he has not been charged and the questioning does not form part of a criminal investigation, article 6 will not be engaged. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 3:55 pm by Nadia Kayyali
That was the message from the Third Circuit on Tuesday when it told the plaintiffs in Hassan v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 12:38 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
” One farmer told Amnesty researchers that Kurdish forces threatened to tell the United States that his family was Islamic State if he did not leave his home. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 10:50 am by Francesca Procaccini
” In the second half of his decision, Orenstein distinguishes the principle case the government appears to consistently rely on when requesting these types of orders: United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]