Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 16,267
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2015, 5:55 pm
On Friday, in Arpaio v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 6:19 am
Dade county is more populous than fifteen of the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 4:25 pm
Ketchum before the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:47 am
Moreover, since June 11, 2009, when the United States made the transition to digital television, anyone using a digital converter box also has access to a V-chip. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm
Interestingly, however, in addition to citing Russell, in its decision last week, the court also cited United States v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 2:30 pm
United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88 (1935). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:20 pm
Wall v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 6:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:25 am
The judgment is vacated [V], and the case is remanded [R] to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for further consideration in light of Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 8:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:41 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 8:20 am
Circuit Judge Judith W. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 7:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 8:00 am
Represented by NARF, the Klamath Tribes successfully achieved recognition of their treaty-reserved water rights in federal court litigation in the 1970s and 1980s in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:33 am
Elizabeth Prelogar, Solicitor General of the United States Hon. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 9:22 am
Facts: This case (United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 9:55 pm
Abbott Labs. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 6:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 9:10 pm
(I see a fairly high likelihood of a post-appeal retrial anyway when I compare the damages theories allowed by Judge Koh to what the highest-ranking U.S. patent judge, Chief Judge Randall Rader of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, said on September 11, 2013 about a Motorola damages claim against Apple. [read post]
