Search for: "BOX v. STATE"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 5,284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2019, 12:16 am
In a new decision last week, State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
In Case Nintendo v PC Box C-355/12 [Kat Posts here], the CJEU explained that Art 6 is to be interpreted broadly and "includes application of an access control or protection process, such as encryption, scrambling or other transformation of the work". [read post]
6 May 2013, 2:23 pm
(citing Kendall v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 10:46 am
Those two worlds, that of the discrete private dealer and the hurly-burly of the art world capital markets, came into sharp legal contrast in late December 2013 with the federal jury trial in Marguerite Hoffman v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:37 am
The plaintiff in Keeton v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:12 pm
” However, both of these exemptions require that the fund securities must be offered and sold without any marketing to the public in the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [feeds.feedburner.com]Highlights this week included:Chinese company Zhongyi Electronic sues Microsoft for alleged patent infringement relating to technology that converts Roman characters to Chinese characters: (Jurist), (China Hearsay), (IP Dragon),US Patent reform and surrounding controversy: general commentary and opinions: (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent … [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:01 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:14 am
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 10:31 am
(FTC v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 2:04 pm
For purposes of public comment on this ICR, the Continuations Rule, currently enjoined by the District Court in Tafas v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 9:45 pm
The most recent Supreme Court ruling was Ashcroft v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:30 pm
Earlier: Bingham McCutchen's New 'Merit-Lockstep' Hybrid BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN - Law - Business - Services - United States [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 12:42 pm
For example, in Muscarello v. [read post]
15 Sep 2012, 4:17 pm
Did they access a safety deposit box? [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am
If you want to really shred precedent, why not start with Marbury v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 3:26 am
Wall also cited a 2006 decision, Hartman v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 9:34 am
See Aliff v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
See e.g., Lamparello v. [read post]
