Search for: "Cash v. Cash"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 8,558
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
R.R.B. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
R.R.B. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:14 am
., v SBR Marketing Ltd., 11-CV-00304 (D. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
We all know that when it comes to paying or receiving cash, the “when” is an important factor in determining the “how much. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 5:03 am
In a significant decision further deepening Michigan's medical marijuana jurisprudence, the Michigan Court of Appeals, in the case of People v Tony Green, held that non-compensated marijuana transfers from one registered medical marijuana patient to another are immune from prosecution under section 4 of the Medical Marijuana Act (MMMA).This case is significant for two reasons. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 9:05 am
Read more: Reuters article about proposed settlement in Padro v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 9:05 am
Read more: Reuters article about proposed settlement in Padro v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
. * Commentators, including lawyers, repeatedly reference “Second Amendment” rights when arguing against any gun control, even measures that would clearly pass constitutional muster under Justice Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 6:05 pm
To be sure, the minority commissioners can write vociferous dissents and try to signal to the DC Circuit that there are problems, like in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 7:34 am
Circling back to New York Penal Law 155.30(5), in People v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:21 pm
Equal Employment Opportunity Comm'n, et al v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 8:50 am
Nathan v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 4:43 am
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
The debt-ceiling standoff remains at a standstill, even as the clock ticks on the Treasury’s ability to stave off default, by engaging in “extraordinary measures” to pay the nation’s obligations. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:16 am
Shafizadeh v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:33 am
Ebates Performance Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 3:26 pm
Because following the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-169/08 Flos v Semeraro, the government considers section 52 to be in conflict with the Copyright Term Directive, which harmonised the term of copyright protection in the EU to life of the author plus 70 years. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 2:17 pm
Bowers cites to the case of Ellerbe v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
(IIT v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 7:35 am
If your thought is to take refuge in Vantagepoint Venture Partners 1996 v. [read post]
